What is an RBTI rating?

RBTI, Rating of the best trend indicator - special rating for trend indicators

RBTI, Ring of the best trend indicator is a special rating for trend indicators, showing their real ability to predict the market trend.

The absolute values of the RBTI rating can be interpreted as the maximum percentage return per month, provided that the maximum drawdown does not grow. 

The rating takes into account the ability to work on versatile forward tests (intervals outside the range of selecting the best parameters). The net profit is taken into account taking into account the drawdown and the recovery factor.

If you want to stop missing out on profits, we strongly recommend that you do not rely on intuition and evaluate your trend indicators in a reliable way.

What is a trend indicator?

Trend Indicator

A trend indicator is a technical analysis tool whose main task is to determine the current prevailing trend. The presence of a trend implies that in the future the price of a financial instrument will tend in its direction.

By applying some rules or different forms of interpretation, any indicator can be used to determine a trend. Therefore, by a real trend indicator, we mean a tool that gives only two types of signals: an uptrend or a downtrend.

A classic example of a trend indicator is the slope of a moving average. Its direction indicates the direction of the trend. Over the past decade, traders have created a huge number of tools to determine the trend. Unfortunately, most of them are useless and cannot outperform an investor who simply bought an asset 10 years ago in terms of profitability.

The logic of trend indicators or why it works in the real world. Traders want to participate in the movements of the market and even more do not want to sit on the sidelines when others are making money. As the movement intensifies, the trend becomes apparent to an increasing number of market participants. Traders open positions and the trend continues. The one who determines the true beginning and end of the trend before anyone else will earn the most. Trend indicators do not predict the future, they help to understand in a timely manner that it has already arrived.

Why are we looking for the best trend indicator?

Traders view the rating of trend indicators

A trend indicator can be the basis of a trading system. In this case, our profit will directly depend on the quality of his work. This is especially evident in systems aimed at long-term investment.

For more than 15 years of trading practice, we have come across a huge number of trend indicators. Some work better, some work worse. Many of us have favorite analysis tools. This is often a sentimental and unpractical choice. As a result, when we were faced with the choice of a trend indicator when designing exchange trading systems, we could not make an objective and confident choice. It usually ended with something like: this one defines the trend quite well, and we'll take it.

It's time to put an end to this! From now on, we will test all promising indicators and summarize them in a rating table. Evaluation criteria and testing methodology have been specially developed for this purpose. As a result, we will find the best trend indicator.

The rating will always be open to new applicants. And only a truly outstanding indicator can hold the first place. Fight, Search, Find and don't Give Up!

The method of determining the best trend indicator

Пример: трендовый индикатор тестируется по стратегии 'Всегда в позиции'
The conceptual basis for rating formation

The trend indicator may make mistakes, but it should not lie and be redrawn on already formed bars. To our surprise, the era of misleading consumers by redrawing indicators has not yet passed.

For testing, we will use the MetaTrader 5 trading terminal and an automatic expert Advisor. We apply the "always in position" strategy: when the trend changes according to the indicator, we will close the position and immediately open the opposite one. This approach provides the most objective insight into the abilities of a trend indicator to predict the future.

For the tests, we will use the symbol XAUUSD (gold). This financial instrument demonstrates a stable trend-based nature of movements. We have prepared a special custom symbol with a static spread corresponding to the current trading realities.

Choosing the timeframe is a bit more difficult. The D1 timeframe could be well suited for our purposes, but the depth of the story is not enough. As a result, the selection of parameters very often leads to retraining and, as a result, the inability to work on new data. The M15 timeframe increases the testing time too much. And as a result, successful parameters do not give too frequent transactions. In the noise of the M15, it is almost impossible to break the spread. A good golden mean would be the H1 timeframe (hourly).

Графическое дредставление отношения периода оптимизации к периодам форвард тестирования
Calculation of the RBTI v2.0 rating

1) We optimize the parameters for the interval 2013-2024, XAUUSD, H1. If it is not feasible to perform a direct search due to the number of parameters, then we use a genetic algorithm. We perform a total of 6 optimizations using a genetic algorithm based on the following criteria: Balance, 2 times Recovery Factor, Comprehensive Criterion, 2 times Profit Stability Index (ISP).

2) From the full list of received parameters, we select and fix 3 sets of parameters: maximum Balance, maximum Recovery Factor, maximum Profit Stability Index (ISP). We obtain and fix the Monthly Return Index (IMP) for each set of parameters:

IMP_opti_maxBalance, IMP_opti_maxRF, IMP_opti_maxISP

Calculating the average IMP for the optimization area:

Average_IMP_opti = (IMP_opti_maxBalance, IMP_opti_maxRF, IMP_opti_maxISP) / 3

 

3) We add to the optimization interval the sections of the history that were not taken into account when selecting the indicator parameters. One year (2012) from the beginning and one year (2024) from the end of the optimized section.

4) We run through the best parameters in the resulting interval. We record the results obtained as: IMP_all_maxBalance, IMP_all_maxRF, IMP_all_maxISP.

5) RBTI = (IMP_all_maxBalance, IMP_all_maxRF, IMP_all_maxISP) / 3

6) PC (Prediction coefficient= (Average_IMP_alli / Average_IMP_opti) * 100

Участки форвард тестирования для рассчёта рейтинга лучшего индикатора тренда
Selection of forward testing ranges

The forward test area is positioned in such a way as to capture a good trend period. The reverse forward test segment, on the contrary, falls during the trend-free consolidation period (flat).

This approach allows us to evaluate the effectiveness of the indicator in various market conditions. In the trend period, the indicator's ability to follow the trend and generate profits is tested, and in the flat period, its ability to avoid false signals and minimize losses is tested.

The role of the Predictive Coefficient (PC) indicator

By itself, the RBTI rating provides a fairly accurate assessment of trend indicators. But in theory, we may encounter such an indicator – which will perfectly adjust to the optimization period and give a huge IMP_opti and at the same time completely fail the forward tests. At the same time, the RBTI rating will be quite high.

The described situation will show a very low Prediction Coefficient (PC) and will give us the opportunity to understand that something is wrong with this indicator. At the beginning of 2025, we are only at the beginning of the journey, with the accumulation of experience we will be able to introduce additional filters to get into the rating.

For now, let's limit ourselves to the rule: if two indicators from the top 5 RBTI have similar ratings, but very different prediction coefficients, we will conduct additional testing on other symbols in order to understand the problem. Perhaps in the future this will lead to the need to modify the rating calculation formula.

The participants of the rating or how we choose worthy applicants

  1. Classic technical analysis tools are added to the rating to assess the difference in effectiveness compared to modern trend indicators. We consider it important to include classic indicators such as the Moving Average, RSI and others in our rating so that traders can see how they work in comparison with new tools. This allows us not only to evaluate their effectiveness in modern market conditions, but also to understand in which situations classical methods may be preferable. In addition, this approach helps to identify synergies between old and new tools, which can lead to the development of more effective trading strategies.
  2. On the crest of popularity: new generation indicators that have conquered the trading community. New generation indicators often offer unique approaches to market analysis using sophisticated algorithms and machine learning. These may include improved noise filtering techniques, more accurate entry and exit signals, and trading automation capabilities. These tools often attract the attention of traders for their innovation and potential effectiveness, which makes them popular in the community. However, it is important to remember that novelty does not always guarantee success, and each indicator must be thoroughly tested.
  3. The magic of marketing: the more highly a trend indicator is praised, the stronger our desire to test its strength. In the world of trading, marketing plays a significant role in promoting various tools and strategies. Bright promises and positive reviews may draw attention to a particular indicator, but we understand that there is a need for independent testing and analysis behind this. Our task is to check to what extent the stated characteristics correspond to reality, and to provide traders with objective information about the effectiveness of the indicator.
  4. The components of success: indicators from real working strategies. Indicators that have proven their effectiveness in real trading strategies are the most valuable for traders. They have been practically tested in various market conditions and have shown their advantages. Such indicators often become the basis for successful trading systems, as they provide reliable signals and help make informed decisions. We strive to include such tools in our rating so that traders can use them to improve their results.
  5. When we are told that this trend indicator is just fire, we usually can't resist making sure otherwise) Feedback is the way to success. Feedback from the trading community is a valuable source of information that helps us better understand the effectiveness of various indicators. We analyze reviews, test results, and experience using indicators in real-world conditions in order to form an objective understanding of their capabilities. This approach allows us to continuously improve our rating and provide traders with the most useful information.
Frequently Asked Questions
The rating does not depend on the creator or the distribution method. In the rating table, next to each position, there is a link to an overview of this particular indicator. In the review, we always write how and from what sources we obtained this indicator. If the developer (copyright holder) does not mind, we place the indicator file on the review page.
We openly provide all the data and techniques. Anyone can repeat our tests and calculations on their own. If a paid product has been provided for testing, we will oblige the seller to provide a demo version that can work in the strategy tester. If your tests do not match ours, please contact us. Our goal is to create the most objective rating of trend indicators.
We've been doing this for a long time. As practice shows, it is extremely rare for an indicator to show a clear advantage over another when analyzing gold prices, but then it turns out to be significantly less effective on other trading instruments. There will be an opportunity to verify this statement. We plan to periodically bring the leaders of the RBTI rating into a standoff on other financial assets.
The history of updates to the rating of trend indicators "RBTI"

 

RBTI v2.0 update - Changes in the rating calculation methodology and the reasons that led to these changes

 
10.05.2025 At the moment, we have added 5 participants to the rating. Unfortunately, significant shortcomings have been identified in the methodology for calculating the RBTI rating.
 
Here are the main problems that we have encountered and that definitely need to be addressed.:
  1. The big impact of randomness on the forward test. In a situation where the indicator under study has a large number of parameters, we must resort to genetic algorithms for optimization. Even making three runs of the optimizer, the best result often turns out to be different, and as a result, we have a huge variation in the results of the forward test. As a result, this greatly affects the final rating of the trend indicator under study.
  2. The prevailing value of the result obtained during the optimization interval affects the final RBTI rating. Our goal is to determine the actual performance of the indicator. Of course, the ability to adapt to historical data is extremely important, but we cannot sacrifice the ability to actually work on new data for this.
 
Ways to solve the identified problems:
  1. Add to the three runs of the optimizer according to the IMP criterion, the run according to the maximum balance, the run according to the complex criterion and the run according to the maximum profitability. When calculating IMP_opti, use the average results from three sets of parameters: The best IMP, the Maximum Balance, and the Best complex criterion.
  2. Change the basic formula, significantly increasing the impact of the forward test result on the final result.
 
The old form of the formula RBTI v1: (IMP_opti + IMP_all) * 0.5
The new formula RBTI v2: (IMP_all_max_IMP + IMP_all_max_Balance + IMP_all_maxComplexCri) * 0.33
 
All the results of the rating participants will be recalculated. Now we can continue moving forward towards our goal of finding the best trend indicator.
 
Calculation of the RBTI rating (Outdated version)

1) We optimize the parameters for the range 2013-2024, XAUUSD, H1. We use the Monthly Return Index (IMP) as a criterion. We record the result as IMP_opti.

2) We add to the optimization interval the sections of the history that were not taken into account when selecting the indicator parameters. One year (2012) from the beginning and one year (2024) from the end of the optimized section.

3) We run through the best parameters in the resulting interval. We record the result as IMP_all.

4) RBTI = (IMP_opti + IMP_all) * 0.5

5) PC (Prediction coefficient)  = (IMP_all / IMP_opti) * 100

Статья впервые опубликована: 17 April 2025

Дата последнего обновления: 11 May 2025